PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMID.L vs. PRUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMID.L is traded in EUR, while PRUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRUK.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMID.L achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 3.80% return.


EMID.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.96%
6M
10.75%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*

PRUK.L

1D
0.91%
1M
3.24%
YTD
3.80%
6M
6.23%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMID.L
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF
7.96%22.78%9.31%14.05%-18.34%21.37%15.89%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.80%7.64%10.96%9.64%-26.74%21.10%23.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EMID.L and PRUK.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.79

The correlation between EMID.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMID.L
PRUK.L

Industrials

26.4%
22.2%

Financial Services

21.4%
19.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
13.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
6.8%

Basic Materials

6.2%
7.3%

Utilities

6.0%
3.4%

Real Estate

3.9%
8.0%

Energy

3.7%
2.9%

Technology

3.1%
7.0%

Industrials

EMID.L
26.4%
PRUK.L
22.2%

Financial Services

EMID.L
21.4%
PRUK.L
19.9%

Healthcare

EMID.L
8.0%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

EMID.L
7.3%
PRUK.L
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EMID.L
7.2%
PRUK.L
13.2%

Communication Services

EMID.L
6.7%
PRUK.L
6.8%

Basic Materials

EMID.L
6.2%
PRUK.L
7.3%

Utilities

EMID.L
6.0%
PRUK.L
3.4%

Real Estate

EMID.L
3.9%
PRUK.L
8.0%

Energy

EMID.L
3.7%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Technology

EMID.L
3.1%
PRUK.L
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMID.L
EMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMID.LPRUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.09

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.56

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

1.89

+5.18

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMID.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMID.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMID.LPRUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.47

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.04

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMID.L drawdown since its inception was -37.57%, roughly equal to the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -37.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMID.L and PRUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMID.LPRUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.57%

-37.33%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-12.50%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-19.76%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-37.33%

+8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-3.08%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-14.58%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.72%

-1.47%

Volatility

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) is 3.95%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMID.LPRUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.86%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

12.14%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

15.00%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

17.72%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

18.80%

-2.52%

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMID.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMID.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

EMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PRUK.L's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMID.L
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF
2.57%2.78%2.75%2.42%2.61%1.78%1.39%2.33%2.84%0.48%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMID.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMID.L.

EMID.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMID.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMID.L and PRUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer