EMHC vs. PDBC
EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMHC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. EMHC is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMHC returned 1.54%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMHC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
EMHC vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHC achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 24.08% return.
EMHC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 10.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
EMHC vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 2.04% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.56% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.08% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 24.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHC and PDBC is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between EMHC and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHC vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
EMHC
PDBC
EMHC vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMHC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.75 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 6.25 | +2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMHC vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -49.52% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -16.55% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.67% | -16.55% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -27.63% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -13.06% | +12.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -23.11% | +13.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 4.64% | -3.60% |
Volatility
EMHC vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) is 1.39%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that EMHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 5.48% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.29% | 16.59% | -12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 18.72% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 19.19% | -10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.90% | 17.75% | -8.85% |
EMHC vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMHC vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than PDBC's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.10% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.09% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMHC and PDBC have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to EMHC (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHC dropped -28.03% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 5-year performance, PDBC leads with 10.22% vs 1.54% for EMHC. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, EMHC has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 3.09% for PDBC.
EMHC is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for EMHC and 0.58% for PDBC.
EMHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHC and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer