EMHC vs. GEMD
EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) and GEMD (Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMHC tracks the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net while GEMD tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMHC returned 8.74%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for GEMD. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMHC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GEMD.
Performance
EMHC vs. GEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMHC having a 1.57% return and GEMD slightly higher at 1.64%.
EMHC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
GEMD
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMHC vs. GEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 1.57% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -13.07% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 1.64% | 13.67% | 3.31% | 8.51% | -15.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHC and GEMD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EMHC and GEMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHC vs. GEMD — Risk / Return Rank
EMHC
GEMD
EMHC vs. GEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHC | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.39 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 10.09 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHC | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.01 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.21 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EMHC vs. GEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, which is greater than GEMD's maximum drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and GEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHC | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -24.56% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -4.64% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.67% | -7.69% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.43% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -8.19% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.10% | -0.06% |
Volatility
EMHC vs. GEMD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHC | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.84% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 4.40% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43% | 5.53% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 9.95% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 9.95% | -0.99% |
EMHC vs. GEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GEMD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMHC vs. GEMD - Dividend Comparison
EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than GEMD's 5.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.11% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 5.69% | 6.32% | 5.79% | 5.70% | 5.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EMHC and GEMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EMHC has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to GEMD (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHC dropped -28.03% vs GEMD's -24.56%.
On 3-year performance, EMHC leads with 8.74% vs 8.37% for GEMD. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMHC has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GEMD.
EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 5.69% for GEMD.
EMHC tracks Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GEMD tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for EMHC and 0.39% for GEMD.
EMHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHC and GEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer