EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L
EMGU.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and VFEM.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from iShares and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGU.L returned 8.74%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for VFEM.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMGU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VFEM.L.
Performance
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGU.L achieves a 24.44% return, which is significantly higher than VFEM.L's 11.78% return.
EMGU.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 24.44%
- 6M
- 26.29%
- 1Y
- 50.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- —
VFEM.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 30.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 24.44% | 22.98% | 9.19% | 4.92% | -10.05% | 0.64% | 14.80% | 3.98% |
VFEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing | 11.78% | 16.90% | 15.28% | 5.45% | -3.23% | 3.99% | 15.04% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGU.L and VFEM.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EMGU.L and VFEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Financial Services
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Industrials
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Basic Materials
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Communication Services
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Energy
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Healthcare
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Consumer Defensive
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Utilities
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Real Estate
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMGU.L
VFEM.L
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGU.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.40 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.46 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 11.41 | +5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGU.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.23 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.97%, smaller than the maximum VFEM.L drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGU.L and VFEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGU.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -31.32% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -8.92% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -14.68% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.05% | -15.28% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -1.46% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -6.87% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.71% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) at 5.23%. This indicates that EMGU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGU.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 5.23% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 11.12% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 13.85% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 15.47% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.50% | +0.08% |
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEM.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMGU.L vs. VFEM.L - Dividend Comparison
EMGU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VFEM.L's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 1.61% | 1.93% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 1.86% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.93% | 6.58% | 7.88% | 6.20% | 4.92% | 3.39% | 3.61% | 2.98% | 2.96% | 4.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EMGU.L and VFEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMGU.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMGU.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEM.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMGU.L and 0.22% for VFEM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMGU.L and VFEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer