EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMGU.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and FEMD.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from iShares and Fidelity respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGU.L returned 8.74%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for FEMD.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMGU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEMD.L.

Performance

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGU.L achieves a 24.44% return, which is significantly lower than FEMD.L's 35.14% return.

EMGU.L

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 5.55%
• YTD: 24.44%
• 6M: 26.29%
• 1Y: 50.77%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: —

FEMD.L

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 11.02%
• YTD: 35.14%
• 6M: 35.25%
• 1Y: 57.69%
• 3Y*: 23.39%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	24.44%	22.98%	9.19%	4.92%	-10.05%	0.64%	14.80%	3.98%
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	35.14%	20.67%	6.74%	9.89%	-15.51%	6.86%	9.56%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGU.L and FEMD.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019	0.91

The correlation between EMGU.L and FEMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMGU.L	FEMD.L
Technology	39.4%	49.5%
Financial Services	17.3%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	9.6%
Industrials	8.4%	7.1%
Basic Materials	6.4%	5.2%
Communication Services	5.9%	2.3%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Healthcare	3.5%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	1.9%
Utilities	2.0%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.2%

Return for Risk

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGU.L

EMGU.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
EMGU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EMGU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EMGU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EMGU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMGU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FEMD.L

FEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMGU.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	3.55	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	4.89	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.66	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	6.42	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.46	21.27	-4.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGU.L and FEMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMGU.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	3.55	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.64	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.58	0.00

Drawdowns

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.97%, smaller than the maximum FEMD.L drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGU.L and FEMD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMGU.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.97%	-27.55%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-8.95%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.41%	-14.43%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.05%	-25.26%	+3.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-4.02%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-8.25%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.70%	+0.38%

Volatility

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) is 7.12%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that EMGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMGU.L	FEMD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	8.69%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	13.99%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.30%	16.19%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	15.06%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.70%	-0.12%

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMGU.L vs. FEMD.L - Dividend Comparison

EMGU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FEMD.L's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	1.61%	1.93%	2.26%	2.51%	3.16%	1.86%	1.81%	0.00%
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	2.73%	3.48%	3.76%	3.69%	3.99%	3.27%	2.62%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMGU.L and FEMD.L in my portfolio?

EMGU.L and FEMD.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMGU.L or FEMD.L?

On fees, EMGU.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMGU.L or FEMD.L?

EMGU.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEMD.L.

What is the main difference between EMGU.L and FEMD.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMGU.L and 0.50% for FEMD.L.