PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGB.L vs. VDET.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EMGB.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMGB.L is traded in GBP, while VDET.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDET.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGB.L achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than VDET.L's 1.72% return.


EMGB.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.86%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.38%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*

VDET.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.15%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMGB.L
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
1.24%10.22%-0.96%4.28%0.69%-8.70%-0.78%6.10%-3.13%-3.39%
VDET.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.69%3.74%8.26%3.94%-5.20%-0.83%2.96%8.80%3.03%-3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGB.L and VDET.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.57

The correlation between EMGB.L and VDET.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGB.L
EMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VDET.L
VDET.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VDET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VDET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EMGB.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMGB.LVDET.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.17

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

6.52

-0.29

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VDET.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGB.L and VDET.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMGB.LVDET.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.57

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.39

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.29

-0.23

Drawdowns

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than VDET.L's maximum drawdown of -15.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGB.L and VDET.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGB.LVDET.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-15.18%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.68%

-4.83%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-8.51%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-11.60%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-0.51%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-6.11%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.61%

+0.02%

Volatility

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EMGB.L) is 1.63%, while Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that EMGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDET.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMGB.LVDET.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.97%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

5.28%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.17%

6.69%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

8.68%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

9.74%

-1.41%

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGB.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VDET.L's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMGB.L vs. VDET.L - Dividend Comparison

EMGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMGB.L
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDET.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.91%6.03%5.84%5.44%5.01%3.89%4.19%4.32%4.61%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMGB.L and VDET.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDET.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDET.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMGB.L.

EMGB.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while VDET.L tracks Bloomberg EM USD Sovereign + Quasi-Sov Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMGB.L and 0.23% for VDET.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMGB.L and VDET.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer