EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L
EMGB.L (VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF) and EMGA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, from VanEck and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGB.L returned 2.27%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for EMGA.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMGB.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EMGA.L.
Performance
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMGB.L is traded in GBP, while EMGA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMGA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGB.L achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than EMGA.L's 1.17% return.
EMGB.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 10.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- —
EMGA.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- —
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGB.L VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF | 1.24% | 10.22% | -0.96% | 4.28% | 0.69% | -8.70% | -0.78% | 6.10% | 0.22% |
EMGA.L iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.17% | 9.83% | -1.04% | 6.07% | -0.36% | -9.65% | -1.15% | 7.46% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGB.L and EMGA.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between EMGB.L and EMGA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMGB.L
EMGA.L
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EMGB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGB.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.26 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.15 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 6.31 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGB.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.38 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.25 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.15 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, roughly equal to the maximum EMGA.L drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGB.L and EMGA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGB.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -21.52% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -4.60% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | -4.60% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -11.30% | +1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -2.70% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -10.33% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.57% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EMGB.L) is 1.63%, while iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that EMGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMGA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGB.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 2.23% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 6.18% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17% | 7.18% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 8.45% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 10.12% | -1.79% |
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGB.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMGB.L vs. EMGA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMGB.L nor EMGA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMGB.L and EMGA.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMGB.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMGA.L.
Both ETFs track JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMGB.L and 0.50% for EMGA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMGB.L and EMGA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer