PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGA.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMGA.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGA.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 22.95% return.


EMGA.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.63%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-2.03%
1M
13.27%
YTD
22.95%
6M
22.91%
1Y
51.92%
3Y*
34.31%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMGA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.79%18.25%-2.74%11.65%-10.95%-10.50%1.84%11.71%-2.92%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
22.95%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%34.44%42.58%49.99%-12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGA.L and IITU.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.36

The correlation between EMGA.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGA.L
EMGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMGA.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.07

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

9.27

-4.25

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGA.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMGA.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.58

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.04

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

1.14

-0.98

Drawdowns

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGA.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGA.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-34.22%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-16.80%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

-26.42%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.60%

-34.22%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-3.20%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-5.93%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

5.59%

-3.81%

Volatility

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) is 2.63%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that EMGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMGA.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

7.00%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

15.11%

-8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

20.05%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.03%

23.19%

-14.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

21.85%

-11.61%

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMGA.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMGA.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMGA.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMGA.L.

EMGA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. EMGA.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMGA.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMGA.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer