EMG.L vs. JHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Man Group plc (EMG.L) and Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG).
Performance
EMG.L vs. JHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMG.L vs. JHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMG.L Man Group plc | 14.42% | 15.64% | -2.97% | 15.39% | -1.55% | 72.22% | -7.02% | 25.52% | -32.33% | 83.45% |
JHG Janus Henderson Group plc | 9.88% | 7.94% | 50.12% | 29.20% | -33.38% | 35.45% | 37.70% | 21.07% | -39.84% | 26.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMG.L is traded in GBp, while JHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JHG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
EMG.L:
£2.96B
JHG:
$7.73B
EMG.L:
£0.41
JHG:
$5.20
EMG.L:
6.35
JHG:
9.89
EMG.L:
1.05
JHG:
2.55
EMG.L:
1.88
JHG:
1.47
EMG.L:
£2.87B
JHG:
$3.10B
EMG.L:
£1.83B
JHG:
$2.19B
EMG.L:
£808.12M
JHG:
$867.30M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMG.L achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than JHG's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EMG.L has outperformed JHG with an annualized return of 11.55%, while JHG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.63% annualized return.
EMG.L
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 45.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
JHG
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 19.63%
- 1Y
- 42.21%
- 3Y*
- 26.88%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMG.L vs. JHG — Risk / Return Rank
EMG.L
JHG
EMG.L vs. JHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Group plc (EMG.L) and Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMG.L | JHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.27 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.86 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 1.95 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 7.68 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMG.L | JHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.27 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.10 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMG.L and JHG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMG.L vs. JHG - Dividend Comparison
EMG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than JHG's 2.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMG.L Man Group plc | 4.94% | 5.65% | 5.97% | 5.37% | 5.35% | 3.59% | 5.65% | 5.02% | 6.81% | 3.58% | 5.77% | 4.23% |
JHG Janus Henderson Group plc | 2.33% | 3.34% | 3.67% | 5.17% | 6.59% | 3.58% | 4.43% | 5.89% | 6.76% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMG.L vs. JHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMG.L drawdown since its inception was -85.43%, roughly equal to the maximum JHG drawdown of -84.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMG.L and JHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMG.L | JHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.43% | -92.68% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.21% | -19.98% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -57.36% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | -67.21% | +16.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -30.41% | +24.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -67.42% | +38.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 5.34% | +0.44% |
Volatility
EMG.L vs. JHG - Volatility Comparison
Man Group plc (EMG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG) at 4.24%. This indicates that EMG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMG.L | JHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 4.24% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.62% | 18.67% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.97% | 33.41% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 30.50% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 33.54% | -3.83% |
Financials
EMG.L vs. JHG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Man Group plc and Janus Henderson Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMG.L vs. JHG - Profitability Comparison
EMG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Man Group plc reported a gross profit of 680.25M and revenue of 831.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.
JHG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Janus Henderson Group plc reported a gross profit of 836.10M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.2%.
EMG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Man Group plc reported an operating income of 240.15M and revenue of 831.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.
JHG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Janus Henderson Group plc reported an operating income of 487.40M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.
EMG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Man Group plc reported a net income of 124.60M and revenue of 831.97M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
JHG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Janus Henderson Group plc reported a net income of 394.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.