PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHG vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHG vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHG achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -5.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHG having a 9.57% annualized return and XLV not far behind at 9.12%.


JHG

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
8.79%
6M
19.08%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
9.57%

XLV

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.85%
YTD
-5.04%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHG vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHG
Janus Henderson Group plc
8.79%16.22%47.54%36.00%-40.46%34.18%41.87%25.86%-43.21%38.52%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-5.04%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JHG and XLV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2000

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between JHG and XLV has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHG vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHG
JHG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHG vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHGXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

0.84

+1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

1.36

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.15

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

1.18

+3.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.30

2.87

+11.42

JHG vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHG and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHGXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

0.84

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.37

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.55

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.46

-0.46

Drawdowns

JHG vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHG drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHG and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHGXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.68%

-39.17%

-53.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-10.47%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.29%

-17.11%

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.36%

-17.11%

-40.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.21%

-28.40%

-38.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.96%

-8.24%

-21.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.18%

-7.12%

-60.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

4.30%

-1.14%

Volatility

JHG vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG) is 0.46%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that JHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHGXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

4.05%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

10.32%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

14.65%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.48%

14.69%

+16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.18%

16.55%

+17.63%

Dividends

JHG vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

JHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than XLV's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHG
Janus Henderson Group plc
1.55%3.34%3.67%5.17%6.59%3.58%4.43%5.89%6.76%1.67%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.71%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHG and XLV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to JHG (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHG dropped -92.68% vs XLV's -39.17%.

JHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHG and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer