EMG.L vs. BRK-B
EMG.L (Man Group plc) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — EMG.L in Asset Management, BRK-B in Insurance - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, EMG.L returned 15.48%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMG.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMG.L achieves a 33.12% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EMG.L has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 15.48%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 12.73% annualized return.
EMG.L
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- YTD
- 33.12%
- 1Y
- 70.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.78%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.54%
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMG.L Man Group plc | 33.12% | 17.85% | -2.97% | 15.39% | -1.55% | 72.22% | -7.02% | 25.52% | -32.33% | 83.45% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -1.98% | 2.99% | 29.31% | 9.69% | 15.59% | 30.17% | -0.64% | 6.71% | 9.11% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMG.L and BRK-B is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.21 |
The correlation between EMG.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EMG.L:
£3.28B
BRK-B:
$1.06T
EMG.L:
$0.42
BRK-B:
$33.62
EMG.L:
9.45
BRK-B:
14.61
EMG.L:
1.56
BRK-B:
2.82
EMG.L:
2.84
BRK-B:
1.46
EMG.L:
$2.87B
BRK-B:
$375.39B
EMG.L:
$1.83B
BRK-B:
$94.36B
EMG.L:
$808.12M
BRK-B:
$71.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMG.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
EMG.L
BRK-B
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Group plc (EMG.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMG.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.05 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 0.30 | +4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 0.64 | +12.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMG.L drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMG.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMG.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.24% | -37.92% | -54.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -11.88% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.90% | -17.26% | -20.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -20.84% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | -21.44% | -29.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.34% | -11.73% | -25.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.72% | -7.44% | -60.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 5.66% | -0.17% |
Volatility
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Man Group plc (EMG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 5.16%. This indicates that EMG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMG.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 5.16% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 12.51% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.77% | 16.06% | +12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 16.95% | +12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 19.76% | +9.58% |
Dividends
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
EMG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMG.L Man Group plc | 4.30% | 6.92% | 5.97% | 5.37% | 5.35% | 3.59% | 5.65% | 5.02% | 6.81% | 3.58% |
Financials
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Man Group plc and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMG.L vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison
EMG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Man Group plc reported a gross profit of 680.25M and revenue of 831.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.
BRK-B - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
EMG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Man Group plc reported an operating income of 240.15M and revenue of 831.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.
BRK-B - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
EMG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Man Group plc reported a net income of 124.60M and revenue of 831.97M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
BRK-B - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMG.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMG.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer