EMFIX vs. GQGPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX).
EMFIX is managed by Ashmore. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. GQGPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Dec 27, 2016.
Performance
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.96% | 35.16% | 7.08% | 9.68% | -26.09% | 4.05% | 30.00% | 30.47% | -16.96% | 44.13% |
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.45% | 9.67% | 6.00% | 28.47% | -21.01% | -2.52% | 33.74% | 20.92% | -14.91% | 29.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMFIX achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than GQGPX's 0.45% return.
EMFIX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 35.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
GQGPX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 10.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMFIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGPX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMFIX vs. GQGPX — Risk / Return Rank
EMFIX
GQGPX
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMFIX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 0.84 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 1.21 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.01 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 3.55 | +5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMFIX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.84 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.22 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.51 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMFIX and GQGPX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Dividend Comparison
EMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than GQGPX's 1.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.62% | 1.65% | 0.61% | 1.25% | 0.82% | 22.32% | 2.32% | 2.16% | 0.82% | 2.12% | 1.00% |
GQGPX GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.91% | 1.91% | 1.50% | 2.54% | 5.52% | 3.78% | 0.15% | 1.06% | 0.59% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMFIX drawdown since its inception was -44.99%, which is greater than GQGPX's maximum drawdown of -33.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMFIX and GQGPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMFIX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.99% | -33.68% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -9.12% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.41% | -30.02% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.20% | -8.91% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -11.71% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.60% | +0.91% |
Volatility
EMFIX vs. GQGPX - Volatility Comparison
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) at 5.75%. This indicates that EMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMFIX | GQGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 5.75% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 8.86% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.81% | 12.45% | +6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 14.71% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 15.98% | +3.51% |