EMF vs. CNWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX).
EMF is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 27, 1987. CNWIX is managed by Calamos.
Performance
EMF vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMF vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 3.98% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 27.20% | -14.78% | 53.55% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 4.79% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMF achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, EMF has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 12.50%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.
EMF
- 1D
- 4.67%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
CNWIX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMF vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMF has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMF vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
EMF
CNWIX
EMF vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMF | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 1.36 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 1.78 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.55 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 6.05 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMF | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 1.36 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.12 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.35 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.27 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMF and CNWIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMF vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison
EMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, more than CNWIX's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 9.47% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
EMF vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMF drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMF and CNWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMF | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -43.57% | -33.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.48% | -16.28% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.87% | -37.47% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.65% | -43.57% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.72% | -16.28% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -16.56% | -12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 4.17% | +0.49% |
Volatility
EMF vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) at 10.65%. This indicates that EMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMF | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 10.65% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 16.88% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.15% | 20.17% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 17.53% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 24.07% | -3.79% |