EMF vs. A1G.AX
EMF (Templeton Emerging Markets Fund) is Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while A1G.AX (African Gold Limited) is a stock. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMF is traded in USD, while A1G.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the A1G.AX values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
EMF
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 41.37%
- 6M
- 49.61%
- 1Y
- 93.36%
- 3Y*
- 36.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
A1G.AX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 41.37% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 15.48% |
A1G.AX African Gold Limited | 70.04% | 1,193.76% | 85.02% | -66.26% | -50.81% | -15.45% | 58.35% | -44.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMF and A1G.AX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2019 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMF vs. A1G.AX — Risk / Return Rank
EMF
A1G.AX
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and African Gold Limited (A1G.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMF | A1G.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.88 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMF | A1G.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMF | A1G.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | — | — |
Volatility
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMF | A1G.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.81% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | — | — |
Dividends
EMF vs. A1G.AX - Dividend Comparison
EMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, while A1G.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1G.AX African Gold Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 6.97% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMF and A1G.AX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMF and A1G.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer