EMET vs. TURF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) and TURF (T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMET charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TURF.

Performance

EMET vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than TURF's 20.54% return.

EMET

• 1D: -3.09%
• 1M: 10.55%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 6M: 36.66%
• 1Y: 116.88%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TURF

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 20.54%
• 6M: 25.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMET vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	24.96%	64.27%
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	20.54%	17.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EMET and TURF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

EMET vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMET

EMET Risk / Return Rank: 83
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMET vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMET	TURF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMET	TURF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	2.60	-2.35

Drawdowns

EMET vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and TURF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMET	TURF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-6.84%	-46.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	-1.73%	-3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.83%	-1.52%	-23.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMET	TURF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.96%	16.51%	+19.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	16.51%	+16.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	16.51%	+16.45%

EMET vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMET vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than TURF's 1.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	1.47%	1.84%	1.89%	2.02%	2.56%
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	1.24%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMET and TURF in my portfolio?

EMET and TURF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMET or TURF?

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMET or TURF?

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMET or TURF?

EMET has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.24% for TURF.

What is the main difference between EMET and TURF?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMET and 0.44% for TURF.