EMET vs. REMX
EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMET is a Copper fund tracking the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMET returned 18.09%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for REMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMET charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
EMET vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 24.22% return.
EMET
- 1D
- -5.73%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 87.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 139.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
EMET vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 11.62% | 81.22% | -12.81% | -12.28% | -17.15% | 0.11% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 24.22% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMET and REMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EMET and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMET vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
EMET
REMX
EMET vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 6.01 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 15.83 | -4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMET vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -90.20% | +37.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.58% | -23.35% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.50% | -62.11% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.40% | -57.95% | +42.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -66.82% | +42.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.91% | 8.85% | -0.94% |
Volatility
EMET vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) is 15.63%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that EMET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.63% | 16.71% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 37.35% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.24% | 49.97% | -11.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 40.71% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 37.16% | -3.79% |
EMET vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMET vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than REMX's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 1.65% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.42% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMET and REMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to EMET (15.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMET dropped -53.05% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 3-year performance, EMET leads with 18.09% vs 5.61% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EMET has been the lower-risk option at 15.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMET has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMET.
EMET has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.42% for REMX.
EMET is categorized as Copper, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. EMET tracks MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMET and 0.59% for REMX.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMET and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer