EMET vs. REMX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX).
EMET and REMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMET is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021. REMX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2010. Both EMET and REMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMET vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMET vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 11.18% | 81.22% | -12.81% | -12.28% | -17.15% | -0.14% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 19.76% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | -0.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 19.76% return.
EMET
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -13.41%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 31.79%
- 1Y
- 100.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -14.22%
- YTD
- 19.76%
- 6M
- 32.63%
- 1Y
- 128.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMET vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMET vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
EMET
REMX
EMET vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | 2.67 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 3.10 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 5.48 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | 16.18 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.67 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.10 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMET and REMX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMET vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than REMX's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 1.66% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.47% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Drawdowns
EMET vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and REMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -90.20% | +37.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.58% | -23.35% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.74% | -59.46% | +43.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -67.01% | +41.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.69% | 7.92% | -1.23% |
Volatility
EMET vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) have volatilities of 14.72% and 15.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMET | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.72% | 15.48% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.86% | 37.90% | -8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.91% | 48.17% | -10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 39.75% | -7.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 36.60% | -3.91% |