PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMES.L vs. DVYE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMES.L achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than DVYE's 10.74% return.


EMES.L

1D
0.06%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.10%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*

DVYE

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.14%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMES.L
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
1.50%13.10%5.45%9.57%-18.82%-2.59%5.41%15.66%-0.48%
DVYE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
10.74%28.36%8.89%20.88%-31.38%11.02%-2.51%15.41%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EMES.L and DVYE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMES.L vs. DVYE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMES.L
EMES.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYE
DVYE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DVYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMES.LDVYEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.42

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

12.61

-2.76

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMES.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the DVYE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMES.L and DVYE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMES.LDVYEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.01

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.29

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.16

+0.19

Drawdowns

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMES.L drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum DVYE drawdown of -47.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMES.L and DVYE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMES.LDVYEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.84%

-47.42%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-6.49%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.22%

-14.63%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.84%

-40.89%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-3.83%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-15.37%

+7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.27%

-1.19%

Volatility

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) is 2.26%, while iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that EMES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMES.LDVYEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

5.48%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

11.61%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47%

14.32%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.28%

16.99%

-8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

18.39%

-9.15%

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMES.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMES.L vs. DVYE - Dividend Comparison

EMES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than DVYE's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
5.11%5.88%11.81%9.05%9.89%7.31%5.27%5.97%5.69%4.81%4.56%6.53%
EMES.L
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
5.78%5.78%5.45%5.41%5.03%3.48%3.49%4.60%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMES.L and DVYE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMES.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMES.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYE.

EMES.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DVYE is Emerging Markets Equities. EMES.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while DVYE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMES.L and 0.49% for DVYE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMES.L and DVYE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer