EMEQ vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. EMEQ is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 129.57% vs 80.80% for QTUM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 59.67% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 44.14% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 59.67%
• 6M: 66.91%
• 1Y: 129.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: 8.85%
• YTD: 44.14%
• 6M: 39.20%
• 1Y: 80.80%
• 3Y*: 48.48%
• 5Y*: 27.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	59.67%	69.78%	-0.73%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	44.14%	36.65%	37.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and QTUM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.66

The correlation between EMEQ and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMEQ	QTUM
Technology	56.6%	85.1%
Financial Services	11.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	0.7%
Energy	7.0%	-
Industrials	5.8%	8.7%
Communication Services	5.7%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Healthcare	1.0%	0.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 89
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMEQ	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.79	2.94	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	3.42	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.47	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.28	5.32	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.17	19.76	+8.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.79, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMEQ	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79	2.94	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.43	1.03	+1.40

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-38.45%	+18.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	-15.26%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-6.53%	-4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-8.25%	+4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	4.10%	+0.52%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 13.41%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.25%	13.41%	+5.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.41%	22.31%	+9.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.42%	27.73%	+6.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.30%	26.85%	+4.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.30%	27.34%	+3.96%

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.73%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.74%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and QTUM in my portfolio?

EMEQ and QTUM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMEQ or QTUM?

EMEQ has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to QTUM (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, EMEQ or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 129.57% vs 80.80% for QTUM. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 13.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMEQ or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 129.57% return vs 80.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEQ or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEQ or QTUM?

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between EMEQ and QTUM?

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.