EMEQ vs. OAEM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM).

EMEQ and OAEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMEQ is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. OAEM is an actively managed fund by Oneascent. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022.

Performance

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	14.16%	69.78%	-1.16%
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	11.76%	26.67%	0.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than OAEM's 11.76% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 30.81%
• 1Y: 82.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OAEM

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 6M: 20.01%
• 1Y: 42.35%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than OAEM's 1.25% expense ratio.

OAEM

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF

EMEQ

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. OAEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

OAEM

OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 87
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMEQ	OAEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	1.90	+0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.52	+0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.36	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	2.99	+1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.73	12.73	+6.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the OAEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and OAEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMEQ	OAEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	1.90	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	0.87	+1.02

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and OAEM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than OAEM's 0.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.42%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	0.69%	0.77%	0.91%	1.63%	0.04%

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than OAEM's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and OAEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	OAEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-17.05%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	-14.63%	-3.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.88%	-9.57%	-3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-3.94%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	3.43%	+1.04%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. OAEM - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 15.38% compared to OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) at 12.12%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OAEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	OAEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.38%	12.12%	+3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.91%	17.70%	+6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.87%	22.43%	+7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	19.01%	+8.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	19.01%	+8.50%