EMEQ vs. MU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 137.32% vs 746.93% for MU. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

EMEQ vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 70.13% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 70.13%
• 6M: 81.37%
• 1Y: 137.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 22.15%
• YTD: 244.07%
• 6M: 307.41%
• 1Y: 746.93%
• 3Y*: 144.69%
• 5Y*: 66.21%
• 10Y*: 55.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	70.13%	69.78%	-0.73%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	244.07%	240.24%	-5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and MU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.63

The correlation between EMEQ and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEQ	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	10.83	-6.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	6.14	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.78	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.71	24.91	-17.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.78	94.64	-65.85

EMEQ vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-98.25%	+78.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	-30.28%	+12.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-9.07%	+3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-58.16%	+54.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	7.95%	-3.16%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) is 19.34%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that EMEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.34%	32.86%	-13.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.54%	57.74%	-25.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.48%	69.66%	-34.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.87%	53.18%	-21.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	50.12%	-18.25%

Dividends

EMEQ vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.62%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and MU in my portfolio?

EMEQ and MU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMEQ or MU?

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to EMEQ (19.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 3.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.