EMEQ vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 70.13% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 70.13%
• 6M: 81.37%
• 1Y: 141.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	70.13%	32.45%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and LRCU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEQ	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.78	—	—

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-40.09%	+20.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	0.00%	-5.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-9.34%	+5.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.48%	113.97%	-78.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.87%	113.97%	-82.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	113.97%	-82.10%

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.62%	2.76%	0.84%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and LRCU in my portfolio?

EMEQ and LRCU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEQ or LRCU?

On fees, EMEQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEQ or LRCU?

EMEQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEQ or LRCU?

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between EMEQ and LRCU?

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 1.30% for LRCU.