PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEQ vs. FRWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EMEQ

1D
2.38%
1M
28.19%
YTD
80.39%
6M
91.18%
1Y
170.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRWD

1D
0.94%
1M
18.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and FRWD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. FRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FRWD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEQFRWDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

38.83

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEQFRWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.00

4.13

-1.13

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than FRWD's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and FRWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEQFRWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-18.49%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-5.33%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEQFRWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.05%

30.09%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.98%

30.09%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

30.09%

-0.11%

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FRWD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.53%2.76%0.84%
FRWD
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMEQ and FRWD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FRWD is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.65% for FRWD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEQ and FRWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer