EMEQ vs. FRWD
EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and FRWD (Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while FRWD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FRWD.
Performance
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EMEQ
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 28.19%
- YTD
- 80.39%
- 6M
- 91.18%
- 1Y
- 170.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRWD
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 18.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 68.61% |
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 35.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEQ and FRWD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEQ vs. FRWD — Risk / Return Rank
EMEQ
FRWD
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMEQ | FRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.68 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMEQ | FRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.00 | 4.13 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than FRWD's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and FRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEQ | FRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -18.49% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -5.33% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEQ | FRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 30.09% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 30.09% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 30.09% | -0.11% |
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FRWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEQ vs. FRWD - Dividend Comparison
EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.53% | 2.76% | 0.84% |
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMEQ and FRWD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.
EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.
EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FRWD is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.65% for FRWD.
Find the right allocation for EMEQ and FRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer