EMEQ vs. FRWD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and FRWD (Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while FRWD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FRWD.

Performance

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMEQ

• 1D: -8.46%
• 1M: 12.67%
• YTD: 77.86%
• 6M: 84.70%
• 1Y: 148.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRWD

• 1D: -4.95%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	63.65%
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF	29.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and FRWD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.83

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. FRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FRWD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEQ	FRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.81	—	—

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than FRWD's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and FRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	FRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-18.49%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-5.67%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-5.12%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	FRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.38%	34.12%	+3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	34.12%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	34.12%	-1.16%

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FRWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. FRWD - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.55%	2.76%	0.84%
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and FRWD in my portfolio?

EMEQ and FRWD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEQ or FRWD?

On fees, FRWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEQ or FRWD?

FRWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEQ or FRWD?

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.

What is the main difference between EMEQ and FRWD?

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FRWD is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.65% for FRWD.