EMEQ vs. COMT
EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. EMEQ is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 107.90% vs 31.84% for COMT. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
EMEQ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 53.76% return, which is significantly higher than COMT's 31.11% return.
EMEQ
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- YTD
- 53.76%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 65.06%
COMT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 19.02%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.08M | $10.46M | $14.41M | |
| $8.75M | $9.16M | $11.52M |
EMEQ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 53.76% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 31.11% | 6.07% | 5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEQ and COMT is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.05 |
The correlation between EMEQ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEQ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
EMEQ
COMT
EMEQ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMEQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 1.82 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | 5.69 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMEQ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -51.89% | +25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.25% | -17.57% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.86% | -10.65% | -10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.67% | -23.90% | +19.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 5.63% | +1.55% |
Volatility
EMEQ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 14.87% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.08%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.87% | 5.08% | +9.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.54% | 19.62% | +17.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.39% | 21.67% | +18.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 21.10% | +13.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 18.86% | +15.29% |
EMEQ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEQ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than COMT's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.90% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.79% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMEQ and COMT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMEQ has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to COMT (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -26.25% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 107.90% vs 31.84% for COMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 107.90% return vs 31.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 1.79% for EMEQ.
EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 0.48% for COMT.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMEQ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer