EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE
EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) and CMOE.DE (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Commodities funds - EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged) while CMOE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMEH.DE returned 16.63%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for CMOE.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMEH.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CMOE.DE.
Performance
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMEH.DE having a 21.33% return and CMOE.DE slightly higher at 21.57%.
EMEH.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
CMOE.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 21.57%
- 6M
- 21.82%
- 1Y
- 33.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 21.33% | 25.40% | 6.63% | -12.26% | 0.72% |
CMOE.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 21.57% | 14.96% | 2.92% | -9.62% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEH.DE and CMOE.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between EMEH.DE and CMOE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMEH.DE
CMOE.DE
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMEH.DE | CMOE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 4.49 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 10.26 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMEH.DE | CMOE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.00 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.37 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than CMOE.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEH.DE and CMOE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEH.DE | CMOE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.42% | -29.97% | -62.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -7.70% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.28% | -11.83% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.34% | -5.48% | -74.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.38% | -19.33% | -62.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.38% | -0.30% |
Volatility
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) is 4.15%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that EMEH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEH.DE | CMOE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.18% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.95% | 15.26% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 17.28% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 16.62% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 16.62% | +17.54% |
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEH.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOE.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEH.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMEH.DE nor CMOE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EMEH.DE and CMOE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CMOE.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMOE.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged), while CMOE.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMEH.DE and 0.24% for CMOE.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMEH.DE and CMOE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer