PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEC.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMEC.DE's 30.58% return.


EMEC.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.54%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*

AMEC.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
10.78%
YTD
30.58%
6M
29.29%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMEC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
10.95%5.92%10.86%19.48%-12.91%37.20%8.36%4.18%
AMEC.DE
Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF
30.58%9.65%16.27%1.43%-18.74%9.30%9.10%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.75

The correlation between EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEC.DE
EMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEC.DE
AMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEC.DEAMEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

5.09

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

16.11

-7.06

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEC.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.65

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.38

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.44

+0.38

Drawdowns

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, smaller than the maximum AMEC.DE drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEC.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.18%

-35.49%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-9.02%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.78%

-24.98%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-27.33%

+6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.34%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-11.50%

+6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.86%

-0.54%

Volatility

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) is 3.47%, while Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that EMEC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEC.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

6.73%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

13.09%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

17.36%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

17.51%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

19.22%

-3.22%

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEC.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMEC.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEC.DE nor AMEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMEC.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMEC.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

EMEC.DE tracks ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity, while AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMEC.DE and 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEC.DE and AMEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer