PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDIX vs. SEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares (EMDIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDIX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than SEDAX's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDIX has outperformed SEDAX with an annualized return of 4.68%, while SEDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.


EMDIX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.72%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.87%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
4.68%

SEDAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.04%
6M
4.76%
1Y
16.93%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMDIX
Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares
2.96%17.32%6.31%14.65%-16.00%-3.01%5.92%13.28%-5.04%15.06%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.04%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%15.55%-8.11%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDIX and SEDAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2012

0.81

The correlation between EMDIX and SEDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDIX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDIX
EMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares (EMDIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDIXSEDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.66

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.14

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

12.71

-0.64

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDIX and SEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDIXSEDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

3.04

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.53

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.42

+0.17

Drawdowns

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDIX drawdown since its inception was -27.01%, smaller than the maximum SEDAX drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDIX and SEDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDIXSEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

-37.03%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-5.49%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-9.44%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-27.01%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.01%

-27.25%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.32%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-6.79%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.36%

-0.01%

Volatility

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares (EMDIX) is 1.66%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that EMDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDIXSEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.94%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

4.98%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

5.68%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

7.02%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%

8.43%

-1.82%

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDIX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

EMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than SEDAX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDIX
Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares
1.90%0.29%2.83%3.13%5.61%2.17%3.71%2.08%4.25%7.78%3.38%4.17%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.67%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDIX and SEDAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEDAX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to EMDIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDIX dropped -27.01% vs SEDAX's -37.03%.

EMDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDIX and SEDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer