PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDIX vs. IMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares (EMDIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMDIX
Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares
-2.91%17.32%6.31%14.65%-16.00%-3.01%5.92%13.28%-5.04%15.06%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%13.65%-1.77%9.40%

Returns By Period


EMDIX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
0.53%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
4.21%

IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMDIX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDIX
EMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares (EMDIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDIXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDIXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Correlation

The correlation between EMDIX and IMCDX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

EMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDIX
Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares
1.02%0.29%2.83%3.13%5.61%2.17%3.71%2.08%4.25%7.78%3.38%4.17%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%

Drawdowns

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDIXIMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

Volatility

EMDIX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMDIXIMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%