PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMDG.L is traded in GBp, while PEMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PEMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDG.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than PEMD.L's 2.00% return.


EMDG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.41%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

PEMD.L

1D
0.75%
1M
1.98%
YTD
2.00%
6M
1.36%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.60%2.35%10.43%1.99%0.28%0.96%-1.56%
PEMD.L
Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist
2.00%4.77%8.05%5.06%-6.65%-1.65%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDG.L and PEMD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.57

The correlation between EMDG.L and PEMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDG.L
EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PEMD.L
PEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDG.LPEMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.45

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

7.16

-1.13

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PEMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDG.L and PEMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDG.LPEMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.55

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.34

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.21

+0.16

Drawdowns

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDG.L drawdown since its inception was -12.32%, smaller than the maximum PEMD.L drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDG.L and PEMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDG.LPEMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-18.93%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.76%

-4.54%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-9.01%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.32%

-13.78%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.18%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-7.55%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.56%

-0.25%

Volatility

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) is 1.78%, while Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that EMDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDG.LPEMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

2.34%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

5.60%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

7.22%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

9.98%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.82%

12.31%

-4.49%

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMDG.L and PEMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMDG.L vs. PEMD.L - Dividend Comparison

EMDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than PEMD.L's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.33%5.95%5.95%4.65%2.91%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEMD.L
Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist
5.45%5.49%5.83%5.54%4.94%3.93%3.60%4.99%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDG.L and PEMD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMDG.L and PEMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDG.L and PEMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer