PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMDG.L is traded in GBp, while LEMB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LEMB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDG.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than LEMB.L's 2.21% return.


EMDG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.41%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

LEMB.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.88%
YTD
2.21%
6M
1.57%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.60%2.35%10.43%1.99%0.28%0.96%-1.56%
LEMB.L
Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist
2.21%4.47%2.42%3.79%-6.69%-1.30%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDG.L and LEMB.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.55

The correlation between EMDG.L and LEMB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDG.L
EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LEMB.L
LEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDG.LLEMB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.55

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

7.62

-1.59

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the LEMB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDG.L and LEMB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDG.LLEMB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.75

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.23

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.37

0.00

Drawdowns

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDG.L drawdown since its inception was -12.32%, smaller than the maximum LEMB.L drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDG.L and LEMB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDG.LLEMB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-23.69%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.76%

-4.62%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-8.77%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.32%

-13.94%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-4.12%

+3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-10.59%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.55%

-0.24%

Volatility

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) is 1.78%, while Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that EMDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDG.LLEMB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

2.04%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

5.39%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

6.73%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

9.72%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.82%

12.02%

-4.20%

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LEMB.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDG.L vs. LEMB.L - Dividend Comparison

EMDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than LEMB.L's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.33%5.95%5.95%4.65%2.91%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEMB.L
Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist
5.20%5.29%3.59%5.90%5.73%4.49%4.12%5.12%5.18%5.14%5.41%6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDG.L and LEMB.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LEMB.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EMDG.L and 0.30% for LEMB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDG.L and LEMB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer