EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L
EMDG.L (L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMDG.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while CYGB.L tracks the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMDG.L returned 2.91%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for CYGB.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. EMDG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMDG.L is traded in GBp, while CYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CYGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDG.L achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 3.27% return.
EMDG.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.73%
CYGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | -0.65% | 2.35% | 10.43% | 1.99% | 0.28% | 4.13% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.27% | 2.20% | 11.38% | 7.14% | 2.11% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDG.L and CYGB.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | -0.00 |
The correlation between EMDG.L and CYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMDG.L
CYGB.L
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMDG.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 5.03 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 11.76 | -10.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.84%, which is greater than CYGB.L's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDG.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDG.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.84% | -1.56% | -29.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -0.69% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.93% | -1.56% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.32% | -1.56% | -10.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.44% | -0.34% | -14.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -0.24% | -21.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 0.29% | +2.36% |
Volatility
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) at 0.60%. This indicates that EMDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDG.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 0.60% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 2.24% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16% | 2.71% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 2.38% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 2.33% | +10.80% |
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDG.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
EMDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than CYGB.L's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% |
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 2.25% | 5.95% | 5.95% | 4.65% | 2.91% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDG.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
EMDG.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EMDG.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for EMDG.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer