EMCS vs. SGOV
EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMCS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMCS returned 7.51%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for SGOV. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
EMCS vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 30.08% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.71% return.
EMCS
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 30.08%
- 6M
- 31.16%
- 1Y
- 55.24%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCS vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 30.08% | 38.71% | 10.12% | 5.68% | -23.58% | -2.02% | 40.24% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.71% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCS and SGOV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | 0.01 |
The correlation between EMCS and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCS vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
EMCS
SGOV
EMCS vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -270.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 194.05 | -192.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 395.07 | -391.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 4,426.92 | -4,412.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCS vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -0.03% | -44.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -0.01% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.73% | -0.01% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.06% | -0.03% | -42.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | 0.00% | -6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -0.00% | -16.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 0.00% | +3.87% |
Volatility
EMCS vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that EMCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.09% | 0.06% | +14.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 0.13% | +22.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.41% | 0.19% | +25.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 0.24% | +21.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 0.24% | +21.80% |
EMCS vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMCS vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.46% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCS and SGOV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCS has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 7.51% vs 3.58% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 3.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMCS.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.46% for EMCS.
EMCS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.32 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCS and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer