EMCR vs. VEXC
EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMCR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
EMCR vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than VEXC's 20.48% return.
EMCR
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- 1Y
- 47.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- —
VEXC
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 20.48%
- 6M
- 23.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCR vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 22.13% | 1.57% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.48% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and VEXC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
VEXC
EMCR vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 2.23 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -12.42% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.97% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -2.22% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility
EMCR vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 18.84% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 18.84% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.84% | +1.02% |
EMCR vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMCR vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.99% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EMCR and VEXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMCR.
EMCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCR and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for EMCR and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer