EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L
EMCP.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMCP.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMCP.L returned 3.28%/yr vs 20.65%/yr for CNDX.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCP.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMCP.L is traded in GBP, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCP.L achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCP.L has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 3.28%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.65% annualized return.
EMCP.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 20.65%
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCP.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.24% | 0.95% | 8.19% | 1.91% | -1.50% | 0.62% | 3.41% | 10.30% | 2.92% | -1.93% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 15.44% | 11.22% | 28.63% | 48.41% | -25.58% | 29.13% | 43.89% | 32.71% | 4.78% | 20.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCP.L and CNDX.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between EMCP.L and CNDX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMCP.L
CNDX.L
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMCP.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.28 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 2.42 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 6.60 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCP.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -27.78% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.15% | -11.11% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.40% | -24.37% | +15.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.10% | -27.78% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.92% | -27.78% | +11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -5.16% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -4.54% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 4.09% | -2.48% |
Volatility
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMCP.L) is 1.97%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that EMCP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCP.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 6.03% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.23% | 13.55% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 17.31% | -11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 20.37% | -12.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.35% | 20.19% | -10.84% |
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCP.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
EMCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMCP.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.65% | 5.54% | 5.36% | 5.03% | 4.20% | 3.59% | 4.16% | 4.69% | 4.63% | 4.49% | 4.31% | 5.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCP.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMCP.L.
EMCP.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. EMCP.L tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMCP.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for EMCP.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer