EMCB vs. BREM
EMCB (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and BREM (iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BREM.
Performance
EMCB vs. BREM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCB achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than BREM's 3.77% return.
EMCB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
BREM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCB vs. BREM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 2.12% | 0.47% |
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.77% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCB and BREM is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCB vs. BREM — Risk / Return Rank
EMCB
BREM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMCB vs. BREM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCB vs. BREM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, which is greater than BREM's maximum drawdown of -4.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCB and BREM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -4.54% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.58% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -0.63% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
EMCB vs. BREM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 5.61% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 5.61% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.46% | 5.61% | +2.85% |
EMCB vs. BREM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BREM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCB vs. BREM - Dividend Comparison
EMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than BREM's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.89% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.35% | 5.47% | 5.29% | 5.09% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.20% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 5.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCB and BREM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BREM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BREM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.
EMCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.89% for BREM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMCB and 0.50% for BREM.
Find the right allocation for EMCB and BREM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer