EMCAX vs. SSCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX).
EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995. SSCPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994.
Performance
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -0.57% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 1.17% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -16.14% | 15.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCAX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 1.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMCAX having a 9.61% annualized return and SSCPX not far behind at 9.58%.
EMCAX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
SSCPX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCAX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMCAX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
EMCAX
SSCPX
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCAX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.94 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.44 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.74 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | 5.57 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCAX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.94 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.20 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCAX and SSCPX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison
EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SSCPX's 8.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 8.91% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
Drawdowns
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCAX drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, roughly equal to the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCAX and SSCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCAX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.81% | -53.65% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -11.83% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -27.78% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | -43.59% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -8.09% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.33% | -10.30% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.69% | -1.19% |
Volatility
EMCAX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) is 5.42%, while Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that EMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCAX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 8.57% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 15.33% | -4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 22.69% | -5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 22.17% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 22.93% | -2.72% |