EMC vs. BND
EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. EMC is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 17.56%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for BND. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
EMC vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return.
EMC
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 25.25%
- 6M
- 27.29%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
EMC vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 25.25% | 18.91% | 3.75% | 1.90% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMC and BND is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMC vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
EMC
BND
EMC vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMC | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.92 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 5.80 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMC | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.36 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
EMC vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMC | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -18.58% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -2.68% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -5.92% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -2.37% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.06% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 0.88% | +2.88% |
Volatility
EMC vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that EMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMC | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 1.23% | +7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 2.66% | +15.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 3.78% | +16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 6.02% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 5.53% | +13.02% |
EMC vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMC vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 0.63% | 0.78% | 1.13% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMC and BND have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMC has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 17.56% vs 3.96% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 17.56% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.63% for EMC.
EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.03% for BND.
EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMC and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer