EMBUX vs. SEDAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMBUX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX).

EMBUX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Jul 8, 2012. SEDAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Dec 4, 2005.

Performance

EMBUX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMBUX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMBUX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMBUX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund	0.00%	15.82%	3.09%	9.34%	-7.21%	-4.30%	11.57%	13.10%	-6.21%	11.97%
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	-1.41%	20.33%	3.13%	12.86%	-14.53%	-4.93%	4.68%	15.55%	-8.11%	15.32%

Returns By Period

EMBUX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEDAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 10.00%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMBUX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBUX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.

EMBUX

VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund

SEDAX

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund

Return for Risk

EMBUX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEDAX

SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMBUX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMBUX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMBUX	SEDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.39	—

Correlation

The correlation between EMBUX and SEDAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMBUX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

EMBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than SEDAX's 7.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMBUX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund	3.58%	5.54%	8.20%	5.49%	8.21%	5.50%	6.56%	7.89%	7.25%	7.66%	3.94%	6.84%
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	7.41%	7.30%	7.24%	4.65%	2.08%	4.69%	1.52%	3.75%	3.17%	4.70%	3.59%	1.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EMBUX	SEDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-37.03%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.49%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.83%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMBUX	SEDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	6.90%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	8.41%	—