EMBUX vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMBUX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
EMBUX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Jul 8, 2012. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.
Performance
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBUX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund | 0.00% | 15.82% | 3.09% | 9.34% | -7.21% | -4.30% | 11.57% | 13.10% | -1.12% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 8.57% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
EMBUX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- 1Y
- 49.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBUX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMBUX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
EMBUX
GLDM
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMBUX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMBUX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.09 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBUX and GLDM is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
EMBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBUX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund | 3.58% | 5.54% | 8.20% | 5.49% | 8.21% | 5.50% | 6.56% | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.66% | 3.94% | 6.84% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBUX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -13.19% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.04% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility
EMBUX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMBUX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.57% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.65% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.77% | — |