PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMBE.L achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than IS0E.DE's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EMBE.L has underperformed IS0E.DE with an annualized return of 1.09%, while IS0E.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


EMBE.L

1D
0.81%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.69%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
1.09%

IS0E.DE

1D
5.81%
1M
-15.57%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-3.86%
1Y
50.42%
3Y*
36.13%
5Y*
18.25%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.23%10.99%4.00%7.66%-20.86%-3.27%3.35%12.27%-8.40%8.13%
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
-7.03%129.59%18.76%6.25%-3.74%-3.07%13.51%44.07%-4.43%-6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EMBE.L and IS0E.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2013

0.24

The correlation between EMBE.L and IS0E.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMBE.L
EMBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0E.DE
IS0E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMBE.LIS0E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.53

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

4.31

+2.73

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMBE.L and IS0E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMBE.L drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum IS0E.DE drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBE.L and IS0E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBE.LIS0E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.73%

-82.14%

+51.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.58%

-32.80%

+28.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.94%

-32.80%

+24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-38.05%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.73%

-45.61%

+14.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-28.30%

+24.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-54.08%

+46.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

11.59%

-10.39%

Volatility

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) is 2.14%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that EMBE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBE.LIS0E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

14.22%

-12.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.88%

34.38%

-29.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.91%

42.45%

-36.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.90%

32.47%

-23.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.48%

32.12%

-22.64%

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0E.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMBE.L vs. IS0E.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMBE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while IS0E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.13%5.44%5.64%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMBE.L and IS0E.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMBE.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMBE.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.

EMBE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IS0E.DE is Precious Metals. EMBE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR, while IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMBE.L and 0.55% for IS0E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMBE.L and IS0E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer