PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMAYX vs. GDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMAYX vs. GDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) and The GDL Fund (GDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMAYX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than GDL's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EMAYX has outperformed GDL with an annualized return of 5.88%, while GDL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


EMAYX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.89%
6M
9.58%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
5.88%

GDL

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.21%
6M
2.88%
1Y
7.66%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMAYX vs. GDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
7.89%21.17%4.10%5.96%-8.78%9.83%5.29%7.71%-2.78%5.61%
GDL
The GDL Fund
1.21%11.83%5.94%9.02%-6.88%8.04%-0.99%5.87%-1.60%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EMAYX and GDL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between EMAYX and GDL has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMAYX vs. GDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMAYX
EMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GDL
GDL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMAYX vs. GDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) and The GDL Fund (GDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMAYXGDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.18

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

2.40

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.41

7.55

+9.85

EMAYX vs. GDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the GDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMAYX and GDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMAYXGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.06

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.30

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.23

+0.22

Drawdowns

EMAYX vs. GDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMAYX drawdown since its inception was -47.93%, which is greater than GDL's maximum drawdown of -38.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAYX and GDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMAYXGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.93%

-38.74%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-3.21%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.32%

-6.00%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.95%

-9.48%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

-38.74%

+13.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.76%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-4.93%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.02%

+0.40%

Volatility

EMAYX vs. GDL - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to The GDL Fund (GDL) at 1.54%. This indicates that EMAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMAYXGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.54%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.47%

5.26%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

7.26%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

8.64%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

12.97%

-2.41%

EMAYX vs. GDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMAYX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GDL's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMAYX vs. GDL - Dividend Comparison

EMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than GDL's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
3.90%4.21%0.00%3.00%0.80%6.84%0.24%1.80%5.52%1.24%0.00%0.00%
GDL
The GDL Fund
5.68%5.67%5.99%5.97%6.12%5.38%5.28%4.30%4.36%5.96%6.50%6.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMAYX and GDL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMAYX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to GDL (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMAYX dropped -47.93% vs GDL's -38.74%.

EMAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMAYX and GDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer