EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L
EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EMAD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while SPYL.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMAD.L returned 36.41% vs 21.76% for SPYL.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMAD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPYL.L.
Performance
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAD.L achieves a 21.59% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's 10.27% return.
EMAD.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
SPYL.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 21.59% | 32.13% | 11.12% | 9.69% |
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.27% | 17.38% | 25.35% | 14.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAD.L and SPYL.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EMAD.L and SPYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMAD.L
SPYL.L
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMAD.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.66 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 10.73 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAD.L drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -20.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAD.L and SPYL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAD.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -20.80% | -25.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -8.14% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -0.59% | -10.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -1.79% | -12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 2.02% | +2.48% |
Volatility
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) at 2.76%. This indicates that EMAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAD.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 2.76% | +7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 9.23% | +11.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.53% | 11.96% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 24.55% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 24.55% | -4.40% |
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAD.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMAD.L nor SPYL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAD.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.
EMAD.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SPYL.L is S&P 500. EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMAD.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.
Find the right allocation for EMAD.L and SPYL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer