EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L
EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - EMAD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while HTWN.L is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMAD.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 20.36%/yr for HTWN.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMAD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.
Performance
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMAD.L is traded in USD, while HTWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAD.L achieves a 21.59% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 60.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EMAD.L has underperformed HTWN.L with an annualized return of 9.69%, while HTWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.36% annualized return.
EMAD.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
HTWN.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- 6M
- 53.46%
- YTD
- 60.50%
- 1Y
- 88.17%
- 3Y*
- 40.74%
- 5Y*
- 20.75%
- 10Y*
- 20.36%
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 21.59% | 32.13% | 11.12% | 6.54% | -21.75% | -6.15% | 28.24% | 16.78% | -14.40% | 42.49% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 60.50% | 32.44% | 25.37% | 28.41% | -29.48% | 28.27% | 36.16% | 31.88% | -11.06% | 24.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAD.L and HTWN.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EMAD.L and HTWN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMAD.L
HTWN.L
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMAD.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.52 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 7.87 | -5.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 21.02 | -12.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAD.L drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, which is greater than HTWN.L's maximum drawdown of -41.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAD.L and HTWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAD.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -41.10% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -11.14% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -28.02% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -41.10% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.17% | -41.10% | -5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -9.76% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -10.00% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 4.18% | +0.32% |
Volatility
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) is 9.84%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that EMAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAD.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 12.05% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 23.62% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.53% | 27.17% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 23.43% | -2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 21.67% | -1.52% |
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAD.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison
EMAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 1.02% | 1.61% | 1.17% | 2.79% | 3.06% | 1.11% | 1.79% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.32% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAD.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HTWN.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HTWN.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.
EMAD.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HTWN.L is Taiwan Equities. EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMAD.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.
Find the right allocation for EMAD.L and HTWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer