EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L
EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EMAD.L tracks the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index while ESPS.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMAD.L returned 6.55%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for ESPS.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMAD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMAD.L is traded in USD, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAD.L achieves a 21.59% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 8.84% return.
EMAD.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
ESPS.L
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 13.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- —
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 21.59% | 32.13% | 11.12% | 6.54% | -21.75% | -8.34% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 8.84% | 19.26% | 5.86% | 5.23% | -7.41% | 7,434.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAD.L and ESPS.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EMAD.L and ESPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMAD.L
ESPS.L
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMAD.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.45 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 3.90 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAD.L drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAD.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAD.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -25.07% | -21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -9.09% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -19.21% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -24.34% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -2.17% | -9.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -6.83% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.39% | +1.11% |
Volatility
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 2.98%. This indicates that EMAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAD.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 2.98% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 10.90% | +10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.53% | 13.38% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 16.67% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 3,127.00% | -3,106.85% |
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAD.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMAD.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAD.L and ESPS.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.
EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMAD.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for EMAD.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer