EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO
EMA.TO (Emera Incorporated) is a stock, while VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, EMA.TO returned 9.71%/yr vs 16.15%/yr for VFV.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA.TO achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EMA.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 9.71%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return.
EMA.TO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
VFV.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.71%
- 5Y*
- 16.92%
- 10Y*
- 16.15%
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA.TO Emera Incorporated | 8.03% | 31.95% | 14.84% | 2.50% | -14.32% | 22.34% | 1.29% | 33.72% | -1.79% | 8.30% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.72% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 15.62% | 25.14% | 2.94% | 13.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA.TO and VFV.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.18 |
The correlation between EMA.TO and VFV.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMA.TO
VFV.TO
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMA.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.53 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 13.47 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.66 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.14 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.98 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.14 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -27.43% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.63% | -8.62% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -19.05% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -22.19% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.73% | -27.43% | -2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | 0.00% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -3.35% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.26% | -0.05% |
Volatility
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.00%. This indicates that EMA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMA.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.00% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 8.56% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 11.44% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 14.91% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.57% | +0.86% |
Dividends
EMA.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA.TO Emera Incorporated | 4.09% | 4.30% | 6.71% | 5.54% | 5.18% | 4.08% | 4.58% | 4.26% | 5.22% | 4.54% | 4.40% | 3.85% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMA.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMA.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer