EMA.TO vs. CU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMA.TO or CU.TO.
Key characteristics
| EMA.TO | CU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.86% | -2.07% |
| 1Y Return | -14.61% | -17.30% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.12% | 0.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.32% | 1.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.00% | 1.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.84 | -1.02 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.36% | 16.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.73% | -40.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.84% | -19.49% |
Fundamentals
| EMA.TO | CU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$13.29B | CA$6.27B |
| EPS | CA$3.57 | CA$2.33 |
| PE Ratio | 13.01 | 13.17 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.34 | 3.47 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$7.56B | CA$3.80B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$3.03B | CA$2.73B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$2.89B | CA$1.76B |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA.TO and CU.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMA.TO achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than CU.TO's -2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EMA.TO has outperformed CU.TO with an annualized return of 8.00%, while CU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than CU.TO's 7.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA.TO Emera Incorporated | 6.12% | 5.54% | 5.17% | 4.07% | 4.57% | 4.26% | 5.22% | 4.54% | 4.40% | 3.85% | 3.82% | 4.62% |
CU.TO Canadian Utilities Limited | 7.32% | 5.63% | 4.85% | 4.79% | 5.60% | 4.32% | 5.02% | 3.82% | 3.59% | 3.69% | 2.62% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.73%, smaller than the maximum CU.TO drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA.TO and CU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) is 3.54%, while Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that EMA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMA.TO vs. CU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Incorporated and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities