PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EM1C.DE achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than JMBA.DE's 4.33% return.


EM1C.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.06%
6M
3.26%
YTD
4.82%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*

JMBA.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.55%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.33%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
4.82%4.52%3.70%6.43%-4.55%-2.31%-6.15%2.67%
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.33%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.58%-4.14%-7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.56

The correlation between EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EM1C.DE
EM1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EM1C.DEJMBA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.84

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

11.71

-2.33

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EM1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum JMBA.DE drawdown of -26.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EM1C.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-26.66%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-3.14%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.21%

-12.45%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.70%

-14.09%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-1.40%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-11.27%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.03%

-0.01%

Volatility

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) is 1.06%, while JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that EM1C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EM1C.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.53%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

4.11%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14%

6.05%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

8.43%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.10%

10.70%

-0.60%

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EM1C.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBA.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

EM1C.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EM1C.DE nor JMBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EM1C.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EM1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core, while JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EM1C.DE and 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EM1C.DE and JMBA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer