ELM vs. PPI

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ELM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Elm, while PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ELM returned 16.31% vs 28.00% for PPI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELM charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.

Performance

ELM vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELM achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 13.62% return.

ELM

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 5.56%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 1Y: 16.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PPI

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -1.66%
• 6M: 9.25%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 19.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELM vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	7.54%	11.88%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	13.62%	22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ELM and PPI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025	0.70

The correlation between ELM and PPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ELM vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELM

ELM Risk / Return Rank: 60
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 68
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELM vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELM	PPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.73	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.33	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.56	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.56	9.83	-1.27

ELM vs. PPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELM Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the PPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELM and PPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ELM vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELM drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum PPI drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELM and PPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELM	PPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-24.54%	+15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-7.98%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-5.67%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-6.45%	+5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.88%	-1.02%

Volatility

ELM vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) is 3.09%, while Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that ELM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELM	PPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	4.72%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.17%	12.83%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.79%	16.38%	-6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	18.99%	-8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	18.99%	-8.62%

ELM vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELM vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

ELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than PPI's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	2.52%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.32%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELM and PPI in my portfolio?

ELM and PPI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELM or PPI?

PPI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to ELM (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELM dropped -9.02% vs PPI's -24.54%.

Which ETF is better, ELM or PPI?

On 1-year performance, PPI leads with 28.00% vs 16.31% for ELM. On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, ELM has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ELM or PPI?

Over the 1-year period, PPI has performed better with a 28.00% return vs 16.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELM or PPI?

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ELM or PPI?

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.32% for PPI.

What is the main difference between ELM and PPI?

ELM is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while PPI is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Elm and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ELM and 0.58% for PPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.