ELFY vs. XLK
ELFY (ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ELFY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Ladenburg Thalmann Electrification Infrastructure Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ELFY returned 47.53% vs 66.93% for XLK. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELFY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
ELFY vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELFY achieves a 29.07% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
ELFY
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 29.07%
- 6M
- 26.90%
- 1Y
- 47.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
ELFY vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 29.07% | 35.82% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 48.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELFY and XLK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ELFY and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
ELFY vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ELFY
XLK
Utilities
-
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ELFY
XLK
-
Industrials
ELFY
XLK
Technology
ELFY
XLK
Energy
ELFY
XLK
Basic Materials
ELFY
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ELFY
XLK
-
Communication Services
ELFY
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
ELFY
-
XLK
-
Financial Services
ELFY
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
ELFY
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
ELFY
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELFY vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ELFY
XLK
ELFY vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELFY | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 4.22 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.16 | 14.16 | +4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELFY | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 3.24 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.36 | 0.42 | +2.94 |
Drawdowns
ELFY vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELFY drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFY and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELFY | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -82.05% | +73.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -15.92% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.00% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -34.96% | +33.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 4.74% | -2.12% |
Volatility
ELFY vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 7.28% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELFY | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 6.98% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.87% | 16.68% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 20.82% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 24.90% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 24.49% | -5.50% |
ELFY vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELFY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELFY vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ELFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 0.82% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELFY and XLK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELFY has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELFY dropped -8.37% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 1-year performance, XLK leads with 66.93% vs 47.53% for ELFY. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XLK has performed better with a 66.93% return vs 47.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ELFY.
ELFY has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.
ELFY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. ELFY tracks Ladenburg Thalmann Electrification Infrastructure Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ELFY and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELFY and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer