PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELCR.DE achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 5.12% return.


ELCR.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
-3.45%
6M
15.07%
YTD
15.74%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*

XDEB.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
3.30%
6M
6.00%
YTD
5.12%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ELCR.DE
Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc)
15.74%15.42%20.30%11.10%-32.41%42.04%63.97%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
5.12%-1.27%17.84%3.65%-4.26%24.29%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2020

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELCR.DE
ELCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ELCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ELCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELCR.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

1.11

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

2.88

+5.49

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELCR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELCR.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-28.56%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-5.31%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.51%

-13.02%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

-13.02%

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-3.41%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-6.78%

-10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

2.04%

+2.52%

Volatility

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.06%. This indicates that ELCR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELCR.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

2.06%

+7.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

5.58%

+11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.57%

7.88%

+14.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

10.16%

+15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.55%

12.72%

+12.83%

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELCR.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELCR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELCR.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ELCR.DE.

ELCR.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Future Mobility ESG Filtered Index, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ELCR.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELCR.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer