ELA vs. FFIDX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ELA (Envela Corporation) is a stock, while FFIDX (Fidelity Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, ELA returned 46.99%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for FFIDX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ELA vs. FFIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Envela Corporation (ELA) and Fidelity Fund (FFIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELA achieves a 104.04% return, which is significantly higher than FFIDX's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ELA has outperformed FFIDX with an annualized return of 46.99%, while FFIDX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.27% annualized return.

ELA

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 14.13%
• YTD: 104.04%
• 6M: 118.05%
• 1Y: 376.44%
• 3Y*: 52.95%
• 5Y*: 36.18%
• 10Y*: 46.99%

FFIDX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 15.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELA vs. FFIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ELA Envela Corporation	104.04%	86.35%	47.74%	-7.60%	29.24%	-21.73%	285.19%	193.54%	-50.55%	-25.00%
FFIDX Fidelity Fund	1.42%	20.04%	27.13%	30.93%	-25.88%	33.22%	26.43%	33.46%	-5.31%	23.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ELA and FFIDX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 1992	0.09

The correlation between ELA and FFIDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ELA vs. FFIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELA

ELA Risk / Return Rank: 98
ELA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ELA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ELA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ELA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ELA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FFIDX

FFIDX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FFIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FFIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FFIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FFIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FFIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELA vs. FFIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Envela Corporation (ELA) and Fidelity Fund (FFIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELA	FFIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.05	1.43	+3.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.78	2.05	+2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.25	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.54	1.68	+14.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.98	7.01	+43.97

ELA vs. FFIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELA Sharpe Ratio is 5.05, which is higher than the FFIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELA and FFIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ELA vs. FFIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELA drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, which is greater than FFIDX's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELA and FFIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELA	FFIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.32%	-55.35%	-41.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.77%	-10.87%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.24%	-22.42%	-36.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	-30.33%	-31.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.03%	-30.66%	-47.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-2.92%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.62%	-11.85%	-45.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.07%	2.61%	+4.46%

Volatility

ELA vs. FFIDX - Volatility Comparison

Envela Corporation (ELA) has a higher volatility of 20.59% compared to Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) at 3.70%. This indicates that ELA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELA	FFIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.59%	3.70%	+16.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.92%	9.48%	+49.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.36%	12.77%	+58.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.33%	19.18%	+35.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.08%	19.43%	+46.65%

Dividends

ELA vs. FFIDX - Dividend Comparison

ELA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ELA Envela Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFIDX Fidelity Fund	1.16%	1.18%	0.00%	2.41%	0.67%	4.60%	2.71%	5.41%	7.40%	11.12%	7.01%	5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELA and FFIDX in my portfolio?

ELA and FFIDX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELA or FFIDX?

ELA has higher volatility (20.59%) compared to FFIDX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELA dropped -97.32% vs FFIDX's -55.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ELA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.